Difference between revisions of "Talk:Distributed Shared Memory"

From Soma-notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
[[User:Soma|Anil]] What are the differences between DSM and NUMA?  Under what circumstances are each appropriate?
[[User:Soma|Anil]] What are the differences between DSM and NUMA?  Under what circumstances are each appropriate?


[[User:Alirez|Alireza]]: NUMA follows SMP paradigm where there is common memory bus for accessing shared memories. In addition, one of the most important aspects of the NUMA is that it provides different access time for the processers based on their locations. For instance local processors can have faster access to local memories. In addition, NUMA access to memory is hardware based.


== DSM Implementations? ==
== DSM Implementations? ==
[[User:Azalia|Azalia]]: What are the different types of DSM Implementations?
[[User:Azalia|Azalia]]: What are the different types of DSM Implementations?

Revision as of 09:58, 23 September 2008

Here is the page where we will be discussing the DSM readings.

IVY

Anil: What were the key characteristics of IVY? What exactly did Kai Li build?

Alireza : IVY was a software based DSM system that's been developed to allow users share their local memories in a distributed manner. IVY was designed to be used in loosely coupled environments. It had five main modules including memory allocation, process management, initialization, remote operation and memory mapping. The main advantage of IVY was gaining performance in parallel applications comparing.

Alireza :(Question) Name some of the applications that you would think benefit from using IVY environment? Distributed Database system is the one that is mentioned in the dissertation. Thinks of something different.

Current DSM systems?

Anil: What is a current production system that uses distributed shared memory? What about the underlying problem makes DSM a good technological fit?

Azalia: What is a current production system that uses distributed shared memory? Any application with complex independent steps that can be parallelized would be suitable for DSM environment. Some of the current sample applications can be (CRM) Customer Relationship Management or (ERP) Enterprise Resource Planning applications that serve multiple users across an organization. What about the underlying problem makes DSM a good technological fit? Apart from DSM there are alternative methods for using in distributed environment (e.g. RPC and message passing), they have some inadequacies that DSM has been introduced to address them. For instance, message passing and RPC, have difficulties in sending complex data structures and pointers over the network due to different memory address spaces. The distributed shared memory can be a solution of this problem since all the processors share the same memory address space. In addition, if we consider current RPC technologies like Web Services, we'll realize that for each task we have to pack and send a lot of XML data around. With DSM we can share a memory space and prevent overloading network by sending XML messages.

Difference between DSM and NUMA?

Anil What are the differences between DSM and NUMA? Under what circumstances are each appropriate?

Alireza: NUMA follows SMP paradigm where there is common memory bus for accessing shared memories. In addition, one of the most important aspects of the NUMA is that it provides different access time for the processers based on their locations. For instance local processors can have faster access to local memories. In addition, NUMA access to memory is hardware based.

DSM Implementations?

Azalia: What are the different types of DSM Implementations?