Difference between revisions of "Talk:COMP 3000 Essay 1 2010 Question 9"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I started working on the main page. The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page. Thoughts?--[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | I started working on the main page. The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page. Thoughts?--[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
* [[User:Gbint|Gbint]] 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt; what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features? I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually. | * [[User:Gbint|Gbint]] 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt; what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features? I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually. | ||
* --[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 14:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I was thinking about the major structure... I like what your suggesting in one section. So here is the structure I am thinking of. | |||
* Intro | |||
* Section One ZFS | |||
** Major feature 1 | |||
** Major feature 2 | |||
** Major feature 3 | |||
* Section Two Legacy File Systems | |||
** Legacy File System1( FAT32 ) - what it does | |||
** Legacy File System2 - what it does | |||
** Contrast them with ZFS | |||
* Section Three Current File Systems | |||
** NTFS? | |||
** ext4? | |||
** Contrast them with ZFS | |||
* Section Four future file Systems | |||
** | |||
** | |||
** Contrast them with ZFS | |||
* Conclusion | |||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 7 October 2010
Essay Format
I started working on the main page. The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page. Thoughts?--Lmundt 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Gbint 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt; what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features? I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually.
- --Lmundt 14:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I was thinking about the major structure... I like what your suggesting in one section. So here is the structure I am thinking of.
- Intro
- Section One ZFS
- Major feature 1
- Major feature 2
- Major feature 3
- Section Two Legacy File Systems
- Legacy File System1( FAT32 ) - what it does
- Legacy File System2 - what it does
- Contrast them with ZFS
- Section Three Current File Systems
- NTFS?
- ext4?
- Contrast them with ZFS
- Section Four future file Systems
- Contrast them with ZFS
- Conclusion
Sources
Not from your group. Found a file which goes to the heart of your problem ZFSDatasheet Gautam 22:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks will take a look at that.--Lmundt 16:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Gbint 01:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) paper from Sun engineers explaining why they came to build ZFS, the problems they wanted to solve:
- PDF: http://www.timwort.org/classp/200_HTML/docs/zfs_wp.pdf
- HTML: http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:6Ex3KbFo4lYJ:scholar.google.com/+zettabyte+file+system&hl=en&as_sdt=2000
Excellent article.--Lmundt 14:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)