Difference between revisions of "DistOS 2015W Session 10"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* Why are DHTs relevant to distributed OSs? | * Why are DHTs relevant to distributed OSs? | ||
Because they provide a way to distribute information over large networks (distributed key/value store). | |||
* How is content divided? | * How is content divided? | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
* Performance constraints? | * Performance constraints? | ||
* What non-DHT internet infrastructure would you replace with a DHT? How suitable is | * What non-DHT internet infrastructure would you replace with a DHT? How suitable is Tapestry for this purpose? | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 16 March 2015
Feel free to tweak the questions!
Kademlia
Members:
- Why are DHTs relevant to distributed OSs?
- How is content divided?
- How is the network traversed?
- What trust assumptions does the system make?
- Performance constraints?
- What non-DHT internet infrastructure would you replace with a DHT? How suitable is Kademlia for this purpose?
Comet
Members: Mohamed Ahmed, Apoorv Sangal, Ambalica Sharma
- Why are DHTs relevant to distributed OSs?
- How is content divided?
- How is the network traversed?
- What trust assumptions does the system make?
- Performance constraints?
- What non-DHT internet infrastructure would you replace with a DHT? How suitable is Kademlia for this purpose?
Tapestry
Members:
- Why are DHTs relevant to distributed OSs?
Because they provide a way to distribute information over large networks (distributed key/value store).
- How is content divided?
- How is the network traversed?
- What trust assumptions does the system make?
- Performance constraints?
- What non-DHT internet infrastructure would you replace with a DHT? How suitable is Tapestry for this purpose?