Computer Systems Security: Winter 2018 Assignment 3

Due: March 26, 2018 by the start of class.

Questions

[2] How can you check the integrity and authenticity of a downloaded ISO image of a Linux distribution? Explain what you must assume for both integrity and authenticity to be assured.
[2] Describe an attack (and associated context) that could be detected using an anomaly-based intrusion detection system but would normally be missed by both specification and signature-based intrusion detection systems.
[2] How are intrusion detection system similar to anti-malware systems? How can they be different?
[1] What is one significant reason that most currently used intrusion detection systems use signatures rather than other approaches?
[2] Why are insider attacks potentially more damaging than outsider attacks? Explain using a simple example.
[1] What is a concept from this class that you find confusing or hard to understand? Please explain briefly the difficulty you are having.

Download the ISO (say, from a distribution mirror) and compute its hash using SHA-1 or SHA-256. Then compare it to the hash available from the main distribution website. To get a further guarantee, verify the hash file using a digital signature. (Normally, wherever you have the list of hashes, you also have a detached signature for the hash list file.) For example, see [1] for the Ubuntu server hashes. The Ubuntu Verify ISO Howto explains the process in some detail. Note for this to work, we have to assume that 1) the obtained hash is authentic (either because we downloaded it from a trusted source or because it was signed by a trusted key) and 2) the hash function has not been compromised. #2 is a pretty safe bet nowadays for SHA256, is probably okay for SHA1 (because breaks have been found but they are still very computationally expensive), and is highly suspect for MD5 (as MD5 collisions are trivial to create).