Difference between revisions of "COMP 3000 Essay 1 2010 Question 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (spelling) |
m (→Overview) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Here we will discuss the general motivations for using languages other than C in the construction of operating systems. | Here we will discuss the general motivations, upsides, and downsides for using languages other than C in the construction of operating systems. | ||
==Lisp Based== | ==Lisp Based== | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 8 October 2010
Question
What "operating systems" have been implemented in the following languages: LISP, Modula-3, Smalltalk, Java? To what extent do these systems match the capabilities of operating systems implemented in C and C++?
Team Note (to be removed by delivery date)
Please use the discussion page for any planning and comments.
Answer
The following is a short list of operating systems written partially or completely with the given language. We will go into more detail in the language-specific sections below.
| Language | OS List |
|---|---|
| Lisp | MIT's Lisp Machines, Genera |
| Modula-3 | SPIN OS |
| Smalltalk | Smalltalk-80 on Xerox Alto, Squeak |
| Java | JavaOS, JNode, JX, Android |
Overview
Here we will discuss the general motivations, upsides, and downsides for using languages other than C in the construction of operating systems.