Difference between revisions of "COMP 3000 2012 Week 4 Notes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(first draft notes) |
m (→Package Management: added example) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
## portage --> gentoo. Compile packages from source | ## portage --> gentoo. Compile packages from source | ||
* Historically, packages distrobuted via compressed archives | * Historically, packages distrobuted via compressed archives (filename.tar.gz) | ||
** Tar --> archives uncompressed | ** Tar --> archives uncompressed | ||
** .gz, .bz2 --> compression | ** .gz, .bz2 --> compression | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 26 September 2012
Package Management
- Two popular ones
- dpkg ---> debian
- rpm ---> redhat
- portage --> gentoo. Compile packages from source
- Historically, packages distrobuted via compressed archives (filename.tar.gz)
- Tar --> archives uncompressed
- .gz, .bz2 --> compression
- This method does not take into consideration dependencies, -pre&post install scripts
Package management's true innovation was that it handled all this.
Yum, apt-get, aptitude are wrappers built around rpm and dpkg. These also maintain lists of repos and do alot of other things. "They have alot of smarts." Basic functionality is done by dpkg/rpm, though. Use yum and apt-get for system upgrades.