Revision as of 19:17, 30 November 2010

Actual group members

- Nicholas Shires nshires@connect.carleton.ca

- Andrew Zemancik andy.zemancik@gmail.com

- Austin Bondio -> abondio2@connect.carleton.ca

- David Krutsko :: dkrutsko at connect.carleton.ca

If everyone could just post there names and contact information.--Azemanci 02:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Who's Doing What

Research Problem

I'll do 'Research Problem' and help out with the 'Critique' section, the professor said that part was pretty big Nshires 20:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Contribution

Ill do Contribution: Achamney 03:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I've noticed a couple things for controversy, even though its not my topic The biggest thing i saw was that dataCollider reports non-erroneous operations 90% of the time. This makes the user have to sift through all of the reports to separate the problems from the benign races. Achamney 17:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Proving that DataCollider is better

Background Concepts

Hey guys, sorry I'm late to the party. I'll get started with Background Concepts. - Austin Bondio 15:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Critique

I'll work on the critique which will probably need more then one person and I'll also fill out the paper information section.--Azemanci 18:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 I've noticed a couple things for controversy, even though its not my topic
 The biggest thing i saw was that dataCollider reports non-erroneous operations 90% of the time. This makes the user have to sift through all of the reports to separate the problems from the benign races. [[User:Achamney|Achamney]] 17:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
+<b>Proving that DataCollider is better</b>
 =Background Concepts=