Talk:COMP 3000 Essay 1 2010 Question 9: Difference between revisions

From Soma-notes
Lmundt (talk | contribs)
Lmundt (talk | contribs)
Line 3: Line 3:
I started working on the main page.  The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page.  Thoughts?--[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I started working on the main page.  The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page.  Thoughts?--[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
* [[User:Gbint|Gbint]] 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt;  what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features?  I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually.
* [[User:Gbint|Gbint]] 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt;  what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features?  I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually.
* --[[User:Lmundt|Lmundt]] 14:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I was thinking about the major structure... I like what your suggesting in one section. So here is the structure I am thinking of.


* Intro
* Section One ZFS
** Major feature 1
** Major feature 2
** Major feature 3
* Section Two Legacy File Systems
** Legacy File System1( FAT32 ) - what it does
** Legacy File System2 - what it does
** Contrast them with ZFS
* Section Three Current File Systems
** NTFS?
** ext4?
** Contrast them with ZFS
* Section Four future file Systems
**
**
** Contrast them with ZFS
* Conclusion


== Sources ==
== Sources ==

Revision as of 14:31, 7 October 2010

Essay Format

I started working on the main page. The bullets are to be expanded. Other group are are working in their respective discussion pages but I think it's all right to put our work in progress on the front page. Thoughts?--Lmundt 16:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Gbint 02:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Lmundt; what do you think of listing the capacities of the file system under major features? I was thinking that we could overview the features in brief, then delve into each one individually.
  • --Lmundt 14:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I was thinking about the major structure... I like what your suggesting in one section. So here is the structure I am thinking of.
  • Intro
  • Section One ZFS
    • Major feature 1
    • Major feature 2
    • Major feature 3
  • Section Two Legacy File Systems
    • Legacy File System1( FAT32 ) - what it does
    • Legacy File System2 - what it does
    • Contrast them with ZFS
  • Section Three Current File Systems
    • NTFS?
    • ext4?
    • Contrast them with ZFS
  • Section Four future file Systems
    • Contrast them with ZFS
  • Conclusion

Sources

Not from your group. Found a file which goes to the heart of your problem ZFSDatasheet Gautam 22:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks will take a look at that.--Lmundt 16:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


Gbint 01:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC) paper from Sun engineers explaining why they came to build ZFS, the problems they wanted to solve:

Excellent article.--Lmundt 14:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)