SystemsSec 2016W Lecture 3

Topics & Readings

- Notes - Chat - Names - Hacking Journal → Starting next week (Hand in weekly) - Grading - Brainstorming

Class notes

Hacking Journal:

2 Note takers per class for participation marks. Make sure to say your name before you talk in order to receive participation marks. Check e-mails for DISCORD app, for a chat room that is set up for this course to discuss Hacking topics.

Hacking Journal (Record of PAIN) - Weekly hand-ins (3-4 hours a week) - Grades per week as follows:

                       0 → no Submission, 1 → Handed in, 2 → On the right track

- End of semester the grade will be given based on journals as a whole. - Journal outline - Date, Time, Durations, Description or explanation of hack or a development of your thinking behind the process chosen. (TXT File)

Brainstorming:

         You may use the text book, tutorials,  and class exercises to get you started in order to teach how to get familiar the defenses.

- Hacking opportunities (Breadth/Depth) - Class exercises/tutorials

       - Not just breaking into a system but rather how you can mess with a security feature. Playful fun hacks.
       - Not just tutorials, more so playing
       - Analysis of how a hack could be done (security analysis) but not only these
       - Not just one project all semester
       - You may extend on projects from other classes but not use the same thing.
       - Setting up of systems to be used for hacking opportunities is highly encouraged. Specifically Linux systems
       - The set up can be documented in your hacking journal
       - Making systems do what they are not supposed to do
       - Repository of exploits for many types of machines (METASPLOIT)
       - Many system specific exploits
       - Hackthissite.org is a good place to start for web security
       - We are aloud to run an old OS and play with its security systems (Old or New)
       - Weekly submissions will be marked based on progression throughout the course (Moving forward)
       - ***MONDAY WILL BE FIRST SUBMISSION OF HACKING JOURNAL [MIDNIGHT ON MONDAY]***
       - Expected to be submitted on time
       - Don’t be a developer be a hacker (Security Hacking)
       - Key loggers are boring, don’t make one unless Android version. If you are going to build something, then do it where little already exits.
       - Bug bounties (You keep the money!)
       - Do research till you cant find much info on a topic and then work from there.
       - Do not work on non-authorized systems
       - Teams are allowed but don’t be a freeloader
       - Go off the rails and collaborate!
       - Hoping that some students will find interesting vulnerabilities

Important Concepts

- Protection domains

       - separating O/S into boundaries so things don’t mess with other things unless the are supposed to. O/S’s try to separate things into different parts, Processes and resources. We don’t not want either to access everything on the     system.

- Access matrix Processes| Resource

                   | A| B | C | . | . | . |		
1   |             | r | rw | w |
2   |             | r | r | w|
3   |             |   | rw | r  |

This matrix will be very sparse. We want something to aggregate. We need to aggregate process and resources. This is normally not enough. - Capabilities vs ACL’s (Access Control Lists)

Capabilities: Each process has a list of what it can access

       ACL’s: A list associated with each object that contains all the processes that can access that object.

Unix permissions are very impoverished ACL.

* A process should not be able to change its own capabilities

- But why do this at all? - Rules and restrictions but why? - Done so programs don’t leak info of one user to another. - i.e. Top secret info - How do we make sure no one cheat’s?

Mandatory Access Control (MAC) - Permissions are set and stone - Cannot be changed at run time - Must boot into special mode with password - Rigid system - SELINUX - Root can’t do everything!

Discretionary Access Control (DAC) - Most of us use these systems - Users have the ability to change things - Windows and Linux are discretionary

* Assignment next week *

This is all from chapter 2 information from the textbook. Assignments will be confirmation of tests.

      - Reference Monitor

How do we keep programs from breaking these rules?

                        - Make sure all rule enforcement runs through a small program “The Rule Enforcer”
                        - You cannot by pass or mess with it
                        - There must be no bugs therefor elaborate testing must be done.
                        - Forbid inter communications between processes
                        - What about covert channels?

- MULTICS