Revision as of 05:12, 19 November 2010

Group Essay 2

Hello Group. Please post your information here. I assume everybody read the email at your connect account. Anyone specific wants to send him the email with the group members inside? If not, I just go ahead tomorrow at about 13:00 and send the email with the group members who wrote their contact information in here. - Sschnei1 03:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Sebastian Schneider sschnei1@connect.carleton.ca

Matthew Chou mchou2@connect.carleton.ca

Mark Walts mwalts@connect.carleton.ca

Henry Irving hirving@connect.carleton.ca

Jean-Benoit Aubin jbaubin@connect.carleton.ca

Pradhan Nishant npradhan npradhan@connect.carleton.ca

Only Paul Cox didn't answer i sent this morning.

Cox Paul pcox

And I just sent an email to the teacher.

--Jean-Benoit

Paper

the paper's title, authors, and their affiliations. Include a link to the paper and any particularly helpful supplementary information.

Title: Accountable Virtual Machines

Authors: Andreas Haeberlen, Paarijaat Aditya, Rodrigo Rodrigues, Peter Druschel

Affiliates: University of Pennsylvania, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (MPI-SWS)]

Link to Paper: Accountable Virtual Machines

Background Concepts

Explain briefly the background concepts and ideas that your fellow classmates will need to know first in order to understand your assigned paper.

Research problem

What is the research problem being addressed by the paper? How does this problem relate to past related work?

Contribution

What are the research contribution(s) of this work? Specifically, what are the key research results, and what do they mean? (What was implemented? Why is it any better than what came before?)

Critique

What is good and not-so-good about this paper? You may discuss both the style and content; be sure to ground your discussion with specific references. Simple assertions that something is good or bad is not enough - you must explain why.

References

You will almost certainly have to refer to other resources; please cite these resources in the style of citation of the papers assigned (inlined numbered references). Place your bibliographic entries in this section.

Discussion

We can use this area to discuss or leave notes on general ideas or whatever you want to write here.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
-=Paper=
+==Paper==
-*the paper's title, authors, and their affiliations. Include a link to the paper and any particularly helpful supplementary information.
+ the paper's title, authors, and their affiliations. Include a link to the paper and any particularly helpful supplementary information.
 '''Title:''' Accountable Virtual Machines
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 '''Link to Paper:''' [http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi10/tech/full_papers/Haeberlen.pdf Accountable Virtual Machines]
-=Background Concepts=
+==Background Concepts==
-*Explain briefly the background concepts and ideas that your fellow classmates will need to know first in order to understand your assigned paper.
+ Explain briefly the background concepts and ideas that your fellow classmates will need to know first in order to understand your assigned paper.
-=Research problem=
+==Research problem==
-*What is the research problem being addressed by the paper? How does this problem relate to past related work?
+ What is the research problem being addressed by the paper? How does this problem relate to past related work?
-=Contribution=
+==Contribution==
-*What are the research contribution(s) of this work? Specifically, what are the key research results, and what do they mean? (What was implemented? Why is it any better than what came before?)
+ What are the research contribution(s) of this work? Specifically, what are the key research results, and what do they mean? (What was implemented? Why is it any better than what came before?)
-=Critique=
+==Critique==
-*What is good and not-so-good about this paper? You may discuss both the style and content; be sure to ground your discussion with specific references. Simple assertions that something is good or bad is not enough - you must explain why.
+ What is good and not-so-good about this paper? You may discuss both the style and content; be sure to ground your discussion with specific references. Simple assertions that something is good or bad is not enough - you must explain why.
-=References=
+==References==
-*You will almost certainly have to refer to other resources; please cite these resources in the style of citation of the papers assigned (inlined numbered references). Place your bibliographic entries in this section.
+ You will almost certainly have to refer to other resources; please cite these resources in the style of citation of the papers assigned (inlined numbered references). Place your bibliographic entries in this section.
+=Discussion=
+ We can use this area to discuss or leave notes on general ideas or whatever you want to write here.