DistOS 2014W Lecture 8: Difference between revisions

From Soma-notes
Hariz (talk | contribs)
Hariz (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:


==Group 3==
==Group 3==
NFS:
1) cache assumption invalid.
2) no locking
3) bad security
AFS:
1) cache assumption valid
2) locking
3) good security.


==Group 4==
==Group 4==

Revision as of 16:19, 30 January 2014

Group 1

nfs:

1) per operating traffic 2) rpc based 3) unreliable

AFS:

1) design for 5000 clients 2) high integrity.

Group 2

NFS:

1) more UNIX like 2) portable 3) use UDP 4) it is not minimize network traffic. 5) used VNODE 6) not have much hardware equipment

AFS:

1) better scalability 2) better security. 3) minimize network traffic. 4) less UNIX like

Group 3

NFS:

1) cache assumption invalid.

2) no locking

3) bad security

AFS:

1) cache assumption valid

2) locking

3) good security.

Group 4