Locus, V, Mach: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:06, 17 January 2008

Readings

David R. Cheriton, "The V Distributed System."

Bruce Walker et al., "The LOCUS Distributed Operating System."

These two papers describe V and LOCUS, two early distributed operating systems.

Michael Young et al., "The Duality of Memory and Communication in the Implementation of a Multiprocessor Operating System."

This paper describes some key ideas behind Mach, a seminal microkernel-based operating system. The design of Mach informs later work in distributed operating systems. For more background on Mach, I suggest reading Wikipedia's article on Mach.

Questions to be discussed

What did the (technical) world look like when this distributed OS was designed & implemented?
What are the key design features of the OS? What are the key compromises?
To what extent is their system a "distributed operating system"?
What is the basic argument for their design choices? What evidence do they cite in their favor?
To what extent do you "believe" their design choices were right? Why?
To what extent does their design work in the context of the modern Internet? Discuss wins and limitations.
What concepts from the paper have been adopted by today's systems? What concepts should be adopted? What should be ignored?

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 This paper describes some key ideas behind Mach, a seminal microkernel-based operating system.  The design of Mach informs later work in distributed operating systems.  For more background on Mach, I suggest reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_kernel Wikipedia's article on Mach].
-===Comments===
-RPC makes the simple things easy, but the most difficult aspects are still prevalent. Good to use if you are only using the common case. For example, a cluster that is isolated from the Internet.
 ==Questions to be discussed==