COMP3000 Operating Systems F23: Tutorial 8: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
WARNING: The commands and programs in this tutorial are potentially extremely dangerous and may result in crashes or loss of data. Additionally, questions may not work as expected on a machine other than the course VM. For that reason, you are strongly encouraged to do this tutorial on the provided OpenStack virtual machine. | WARNING: The commands and programs in this tutorial are potentially extremely dangerous and may result in crashes or loss of data. Additionally, questions may not work as expected on a machine other than the course VM. For that reason, you are strongly encouraged to do this tutorial on the provided OpenStack virtual machine. | ||
To get started, we will first examine the source code for < | To get started, we will first examine the source code for <code>3000physicalview.c</code> and <code>3000memview2.c</code>, both of which are in [https://people.scs.carleton.ca/~abdou/comp3000/f23/tut8/3000physicalview.tar.gz 3000physicalview.tar.gz]. | ||
==Tasks part A: Getting Started== | ==Tasks part A: Getting Started== | ||
Compile < | Compile <code>3000physicalview</code> and <code>3000memview2</code> using the provided <code>Makefile</code> (i.e., by running <code>make</code>). | ||
Insert < | Insert <code>3000physicalview</code> by running <code>make insert</code>. Confirm that the module is inserted using <code>lsmod</code>. | ||
# Examine the call to < | # Examine the call to <code>copy_from_user()</code> and <code>copy_to_user()</code> on lines 120 and 132 of <code>3000physicalview.c</code> (as also discussed in the lecture). Consider the following: | ||
#* How are these functions different from < | #* How are these functions different from <code>get_user()</code>/<code>put_user()</code> that we have seen in the previous tutorial? | ||
#* Why are these functions necessary? Couldn't we just access the userspace address directly? What could happen if we did? | #* Why are these functions necessary? Couldn't we just access the userspace address directly? What could happen if we did? | ||
# < | # <code>3000physicalview</code> exposes its API to userspace in the form of an <code>ioctl(2)</code> call. Consider the following: | ||
#* What is an ioctl? How is it different from a read or write system call? Hint: check < | #* What is an ioctl? How is it different from a read or write system call? Hint: check <code>man 2 ioctl</code>. | ||
#* How does < | #* How does <code>3000physicalview</code> implement its ioctl? What arguments does it take? | ||
#* How does < | #* How does <code>3000memview2</code> call the ioctl? What arguments does it pass to the ioctl? | ||
# Which function does the virtual-to-physical translation? What type is < | # Which function does the virtual-to-physical translation? What type is <code>current->mm</code>? How does it give you the address of the <code>pgd</code>? Recall the page table walk explained in the lecture and see how it’s reflected in this function (writing it down is optional). | ||
# Once you’ve got the page frame number (pfn), how is the physical address (phys) calculated? Describe in words. | # Once you’ve got the page frame number (pfn), how is the physical address (phys) calculated? Describe in words. | ||
==Tasks part B: Examining Physical Memory Mappings== | ==Tasks part B: Examining Physical Memory Mappings== | ||
# With < | # With <code>3000physicalview</code> inserted, run <code>3000memview2</code> and examine the output. Note that it presents virtual memory addresses on the left, and physical addresses on the right. Are these mappings consistent with what you expected (e.g., in terms of patterns)? | ||
# Compare < | # Compare <code>3000memview2</code> with <code>3000memview</code> from Tutorial 2. What is similar about their code, and what is different? How similar is their output? | ||
# Do you notice a pattern in the virtual addresses of < | # Do you notice a pattern in the virtual addresses of <code>buf[i]</code>? Is this same pattern present in the physical addresses? Why or why not? | ||
# Run < | # Run <code>3000memview2</code> a few more times and consider the following: | ||
#* Are the virtual addresses the same or different between runs? How about physical addresses? | #* Are the virtual addresses the same or different between runs? How about physical addresses? | ||
#* Some physical addresses don't seem to be changing between runs. Which ones? Why do you think this might be the case? | #* Some physical addresses don't seem to be changing between runs. Which ones? Why do you think this might be the case? | ||
# Force the kernel to drop the virtual memory cache using < | # Force the kernel to drop the virtual memory cache using <code>sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches</code>. Run <code>3000memview2</code> one more time and note that the physical addresses that stayed the same previously have now changed. What do you think just happened? | ||
==Tasks part C: Using < | ==Tasks part C: Using <code>bpftrace</code> to Monitor <code>3000physicalview</code> and <code>3000memview2</code>== | ||
Now recall what you tried with eBPF in Tutorial 7 (where you applied the fix if applicable). We can also do something similar to watch the interaction between < | Now recall what you tried with eBPF in Tutorial 7 (where you applied the fix if applicable). We can also do something similar to watch the interaction between <code>3000physicalview</code> and <code>3000memview2</code>. | ||
Note: No in-depth understanding of eBPF is expected in this course. You only need to understand what is involved and discussed. Feel free to read more if interested. | Note: No in-depth understanding of eBPF is expected in this course. You only need to understand what is involved and discussed. Feel free to read more if interested. | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
<li>Use the following "one-liner" (as it is just a one-line string within the single quotation marks) in a new terminal session first and in the orginal one run < | <li>Use the following "one-liner" (as it is just a one-line string within the single quotation marks) in a new terminal session first and in the orginal one run <code>./3000memview2</code> as above: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
< | <code>sudo bpftrace -e 'tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_ioctl { printf("%s: fd=%d; cmd=%d; arg=%ld \n", comm, args->fd, args->cmd, args->arg); }' | grep 3000memview2</code> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
What does this one-liner do? As always, you can check < | What does this one-liner do? As always, you can check <code>man bpftrace</code> if needed.</li> | ||
<li>(<b>Optional</b> in the submission but you should do it) It seems the command above does not show useful information as the third argument is actually a pointer. So, to be able to show the two arguments < | <li>(<b>Optional</b> in the submission but you should do it) It seems the command above does not show useful information as the third argument is actually a pointer. So, to be able to show the two arguments <code>virt</code> and <code>phys</code> defined in <code>3000physicalview.h</code>, you will need to create a *.bt file. | ||
Refer to < | Refer to <code>/usr/sbin/*.bt</code> and convert the one-liner above into something like <code>snoop3000physicalview.bt</code>, so that when it runs it prints the <code>virt</code> passed in and the <code>phys</code> that is returned. | ||
The code will be posted and explained. | The code will be posted and explained. | ||
<br> Note: if you choose to directly include the header file you need to create a copy and remove the < | <br> Note: if you choose to directly include the header file you need to create a copy and remove the <code>MODULE_*</code> macros. Otherwise, you can simply include the struct definition.</li> | ||
</ol> | </ol> |
Latest revision as of 02:07, 25 October 2023
In this tutorial, you’ll be learning about how virtual addresses are mapped to physical addresses (the address translation) and continue to use kernel modules to extract information that only the kernel has access to. In particular, the kernel module performs a 5-level page table walk to find out the physical address corresponding to a userspace virtual address. In addition to what was discussed in the class, You can also read more about 5-level paging, if interested.
Introduction
WARNING: The commands and programs in this tutorial are potentially extremely dangerous and may result in crashes or loss of data. Additionally, questions may not work as expected on a machine other than the course VM. For that reason, you are strongly encouraged to do this tutorial on the provided OpenStack virtual machine.
To get started, we will first examine the source code for 3000physicalview.c
and 3000memview2.c
, both of which are in 3000physicalview.tar.gz.
Tasks part A: Getting Started
Compile 3000physicalview
and 3000memview2
using the provided Makefile
(i.e., by running make
).
Insert 3000physicalview
by running make insert
. Confirm that the module is inserted using lsmod
.
- Examine the call to
copy_from_user()
andcopy_to_user()
on lines 120 and 132 of3000physicalview.c
(as also discussed in the lecture). Consider the following:- How are these functions different from
get_user()
/put_user()
that we have seen in the previous tutorial? - Why are these functions necessary? Couldn't we just access the userspace address directly? What could happen if we did?
- How are these functions different from
3000physicalview
exposes its API to userspace in the form of anioctl(2)
call. Consider the following:- What is an ioctl? How is it different from a read or write system call? Hint: check
man 2 ioctl
. - How does
3000physicalview
implement its ioctl? What arguments does it take? - How does
3000memview2
call the ioctl? What arguments does it pass to the ioctl?
- What is an ioctl? How is it different from a read or write system call? Hint: check
- Which function does the virtual-to-physical translation? What type is
current->mm
? How does it give you the address of thepgd
? Recall the page table walk explained in the lecture and see how it’s reflected in this function (writing it down is optional). - Once you’ve got the page frame number (pfn), how is the physical address (phys) calculated? Describe in words.
Tasks part B: Examining Physical Memory Mappings
- With
3000physicalview
inserted, run3000memview2
and examine the output. Note that it presents virtual memory addresses on the left, and physical addresses on the right. Are these mappings consistent with what you expected (e.g., in terms of patterns)? - Compare
3000memview2
with3000memview
from Tutorial 2. What is similar about their code, and what is different? How similar is their output? - Do you notice a pattern in the virtual addresses of
buf[i]
? Is this same pattern present in the physical addresses? Why or why not? - Run
3000memview2
a few more times and consider the following:- Are the virtual addresses the same or different between runs? How about physical addresses?
- Some physical addresses don't seem to be changing between runs. Which ones? Why do you think this might be the case?
- Force the kernel to drop the virtual memory cache using
sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
. Run3000memview2
one more time and note that the physical addresses that stayed the same previously have now changed. What do you think just happened?
Tasks part C: Using bpftrace
to Monitor 3000physicalview
and 3000memview2
Now recall what you tried with eBPF in Tutorial 7 (where you applied the fix if applicable). We can also do something similar to watch the interaction between 3000physicalview
and 3000memview2
.
Note: No in-depth understanding of eBPF is expected in this course. You only need to understand what is involved and discussed. Feel free to read more if interested.
- Use the following "one-liner" (as it is just a one-line string within the single quotation marks) in a new terminal session first and in the orginal one run
./3000memview2
as above:sudo bpftrace -e 'tracepoint:syscalls:sys_enter_ioctl { printf("%s: fd=%d; cmd=%d; arg=%ld \n", comm, args->fd, args->cmd, args->arg); }' | grep 3000memview2
man bpftrace
if needed. - (Optional in the submission but you should do it) It seems the command above does not show useful information as the third argument is actually a pointer. So, to be able to show the two arguments
virt
andphys
defined in3000physicalview.h
, you will need to create a *.bt file. Refer to/usr/sbin/*.bt
and convert the one-liner above into something likesnoop3000physicalview.bt
, so that when it runs it prints thevirt
passed in and thephys
that is returned. The code will be posted and explained.
Note: if you choose to directly include the header file you need to create a copy and remove theMODULE_*
macros. Otherwise, you can simply include the struct definition.