Talk:COMP 3000 Essay 2 2010 Question 1 - Revision history

Rannath: /* Critique */

2010-12-03T04:33:56Z

Critique

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 3 December 2010
Line 92:		Line 92:
	The kernel design does not seem to affect the scalability of the system. While kernel changes do help, they are not enough; the applications must also be scalable. Finally, there must also be improvements to currently non-scalable hardware.		The kernel design does not seem to affect the scalability of the system. While kernel changes do help, they are not enough; the applications must also be scalable. Finally, there must also be improvements to currently non-scalable hardware.

	==Critique==		==Critique - DONE!!!==
	Aside from a few acronyms that were unexplained (e.g. Linux TLB) the paper has no real stylistic problems.		Aside from a few acronyms that were unexplained (e.g. Linux TLB) the paper has no real stylistic problems.

2010-12-03T04:33:24Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 3 December 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	=Methodology=		=Methodology=
	We should probably have our work verified by at least one group member before posting to the actual page		We should probably have our work verified by at least one group member before posting to the actual page

	~~=To Do=~~
	*The only thing we need to do is determine how fair the conclusion is.
	*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p
	*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)
	**also been reading this thing on and off all day, I still really have no idea how to determine the fairness of the conclusion.

	*I'm heading to bed because I am still feeling quite sick, so let me know in the next few minutes if there is anything else that I need to do.
	**if you're there for the next 2 minutes check my grammar and what not.

	=Essay=		=Essay=

2010-12-03T04:29:32Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 3 December 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	*I'm heading to bed because I am still feeling quite sick, so let me know in the next few minutes if there is anything else that I need to do.		*I'm heading to bed because I am still feeling quite sick, so let me know in the next few minutes if there is anything else that I need to do.
			**if you're there for the next 2 minutes check my grammar and what not.

	=Essay=		=Essay=

2010-12-03T04:29:05Z

Conclusion: Sections 6 & 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 3 December 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:

	===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===		===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===
	Each testing case has the same specific parameters, with the only changes being from the stock kernel to the PK kernel. ~~Ther~~ was one assumption that held true for all tests, the I/O bottleneck was irrelevant to the tests. Thus the conclusion has no concerns with respect to the content.		Each testing case has the same specific parameters, with the only changes being from the stock kernel to the PK kernel. There was one assumption that held true for all tests, the I/O bottleneck was irrelevant to the tests. Thus the conclusion has no concerns with respect to the content.

2010-12-03T04:28:20Z

Conclusion: Sections 6 & 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 3 December 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:

	===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===		===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===
	~~There is no faulty logic in the conclusion, no out right lies, no fallacies. Thus its fair. I do not know however if its valid. -[[Rannath]]~~		Each testing case has the same specific parameters, with the only changes being from the stock kernel to the PK kernel. Ther was one assumption that held true for all tests, the I/O bottleneck was irrelevant to the tests. Thus the conclusion has no concerns with respect to the content.

	~~More or less, each~~ testing case has the same specific parameters, with the only changes being from the stock kernel to the PK kernel. ~~Since~~ the ~~purpose of the paper~~ was to ~~test scalability under certain assumptions, as long as those assumptions are maintained,~~ the ~~end result is fair~~. ~~- [[Dan B~~.]]

2010-12-03T04:27:03Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:27, 3 December 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	=To Do=		=To Do=
	*The only thing we need to do is determine how fair the conclusion is.		*The only thing we need to do is determine how fair the conclusion is.

	*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p		*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p
	*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)		*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)
	**also been reading this thing on and off all day, I still really have no idea how to determine the fairness of the conclusion.		**also been reading this thing on and off all day, I still really have no idea how to determine the fairness of the conclusion.

			*I'm heading to bed because I am still feeling quite sick, so let me know in the next few minutes if there is anything else that I need to do.

	=Essay=		=Essay=

2010-12-03T04:22:30Z

Conclusion: Sections 6 & 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 3 December 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:
	===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===		===Conclusion: ''Sections 6 & 7''===
	There is no faulty logic in the conclusion, no out right lies, no fallacies. Thus its fair. I do not know however if its valid. -[[Rannath]]		There is no faulty logic in the conclusion, no out right lies, no fallacies. Thus its fair. I do not know however if its valid. -[[Rannath]]

			More or less, each testing case has the same specific parameters, with the only changes being from the stock kernel to the PK kernel. Since the purpose of the paper was to test scalability under certain assumptions, as long as those assumptions are maintained, the end result is fair. - [[Dan B.]]

2010-12-03T04:17:21Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 3 December 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p		*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p
	*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)		*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)
			**also been reading this thing on and off all day, I still really have no idea how to determine the fairness of the conclusion.

	=Essay=		=Essay=

2010-12-03T04:16:14Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 3 December 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p		*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p
			*This stuff made sense to you at some point? (jk)

	=Essay=		=Essay=

2010-12-03T04:15:32Z

To Do

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 3 December 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	=To Do=		=To Do=
	*The only thing we need to do is determine how fair the conclusion is.		*The only thing we need to do is determine how fair the conclusion is.

			*re-read each section to make sure tiredness hasn't made things make less sense :p

	=Essay=		=Essay=