Talk:COMP 3000 Essay 1 2010 Question 11 - Revision history

Myagi: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T03:43:38Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 15 October 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::::Cool, I added the section in. --[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::::Cool, I added the section in. --[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	::The four quadrants thing is something I came up with cause that's how I visualized it. You can imagine how secure something is with some points mapped on quadrants. I was trying to point out the strength of an OSDs security with this analogy but I guess it didn't flow well.		::The four quadrants thing is something I came up with cause that's how I visualized it. You can imagine how secure something is with some points mapped on those quadrants(external, internal, malicious, accidental). I was trying to point out the strength of an OSDs security with this analogy but I guess it didn't flow well.

	::--[[User:Myagi\|Myagi]] 23:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::--[[User:Myagi\|Myagi]] 23:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Myagi: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T03:40:43Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:40, 15 October 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:

	::::Cool, I added the section in. --[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::::Cool, I added the section in. --[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			::The four quadrants thing is something I came up with cause that's how I visualized it. You can imagine how secure something is with some points mapped on quadrants. I was trying to point out the strength of an OSDs security with this analogy but I guess it didn't flow well.

			::--[[User:Myagi\|Myagi]] 23:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Mbingham: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T02:39:49Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 15 October 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::: Ok if Anil mentioned it, it's probably a good idea to include it, maybe after the 3 comparisons. I got an email back from Anil and he said that headings are OK as long as they add to the essay. So I think we can leave them in. --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 02:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::: Ok if Anil mentioned it, it's probably a good idea to include it, maybe after the 3 comparisons. I got an email back from Anil and he said that headings are OK as long as they add to the essay. So I think we can leave them in. --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 02:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			::::Cool, I added the section in. --[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Smcilroy at 02:30, 15 October 2010

2010-10-15T02:30:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 15 October 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
	----
			::: Ok if Anil mentioned it, it's probably a good idea to include it, maybe after the 3 comparisons. I got an email back from Anil and he said that headings are OK as long as they add to the essay. So I think we can leave them in. --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 02:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Mbingham: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T02:11:47Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 15 October 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			::Also (sorry for all the comments), where does the first sentence of the Security section come from? It sounds like something that should be referenced, and seems kind of out of place because I don't think those four "quadrants" are brought up again?

			::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
			----

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Mbingham: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T02:09:39Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 15 October 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 01:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 01:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			::Heres a quick example section, I know this is pretty last minute but what do you guys think?

			::Ceph is an example of a real world networked storage system based around OSDs. The Ceph developers specifically list performance, reliability, and scalability as the benefits their system offers over current solutions. (insert reference to paper) Since Ceph is based on OSDs, it takes advantage of the ability for clients to interact directly with the devices, which avoids the traditional bottlenecks to performance caused by SAN controllers or NAS heads. This direct access allows Ceph to support a very large number of clients concurrently accessing data on the system. Since objects have security controls it can allow this direct access safely, unlike other network storage architectures.

			::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Mbingham: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T01:56:12Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 15 October 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::Anil had mentioned to me today an example of a networked file system based on object store devices - [http://ceph.newdream.net/about/ Ceph]. [http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi06/tech/full_papers/weil/weil_html/ here is the full paper] on the system. I was thinking it might be worth it to mention it at least, maybe even have a small section about it, just so we get in a real world example of this technology. What do you guys think?		::Anil had mentioned to me today an example of a networked file system based on object store devices - [http://ceph.newdream.net/about/ Ceph]. [http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi06/tech/full_papers/weil/weil_html/ here is the full paper] on the system. I was thinking it might be worth it to mention it at least, maybe even have a small section about it, just so we get in a real world example of this technology. What do you guys think?

			::--[[User:Mbingham\|Mbingham]] 01:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Mbingham: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-15T01:55:59Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 15 October 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this format acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)		I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this format acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
	: Yes, that looks alot better --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 00:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)		: Yes, that looks alot better --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 00:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

			::I think we can keep some of the main headings, but I don't think we need them all. I think the real meat of the essay is in the comparisons with networked storage like NAS and especially SAN, so those sections should probably have headings of some kind. I also agree on the flow needing some work, some of the sections have a bit of overlap.

			::Anil had mentioned to me today an example of a networked file system based on object store devices - [http://ceph.newdream.net/about/ Ceph]. [http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi06/tech/full_papers/weil/weil_html/ here is the full paper] on the system. I was thinking it might be worth it to mention it at least, maybe even have a small section about it, just so we get in a real world example of this technology. What do you guys think?

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Smcilroy at 00:34, 15 October 2010

2010-10-15T00:34:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 15 October 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this format acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)		I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this format acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
			: Yes, that looks alot better --[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 00:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==

Dagar: /* Last minute changes */

2010-10-14T23:46:33Z

Last minute changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 14 October 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	--[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 23:12, 14 October 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Smcilroy\|Smcilroy]] 23:12, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

	I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)		I'm trying to cleanup the references, is this format acceptable? --[[User:Dagar\|Dagar]] 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

	== Tightening up the Intro ==		== Tightening up the Intro ==